Star Trek Fan Games
http://bote2.square7.ch/forum/

EMPIRE STRUCTURE LIST
http://bote2.square7.ch/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=542		 Page 3 of 3
Author:  ralf1224 [ 29 Jul 2005, 20:15 ]
Post subject:  Re: EMPIRE STRUCTURE LIST
ahh thanx for letting me know
Author:  Matress_of_evil [ 08 Aug 2005, 18:29 ]
Post subject:  Re: EMPIRE STRUCTURE LIST
Just reading your post then xir_, about Ketracell poisoning.

Then I thought (And I don't know why) what about naming the Dominion morale one 'Ketracel Redistribution'.

Those Jem'Hadar that are deemed to be loyal would be given more ketracel, whilst any that may falter would get a reduction/loss of white. That would be a very powerful hold over the Jem'Hadar troops, and would further emphasize their need for it.

How it would work with Vorta and Minor races though...ummm...drug addiction camps to get everyone else addicted? :lol:
Author:  CVN-65 [ 08 Aug 2005, 20:46 ]
Post subject:  Re: EMPIRE STRUCTURE LIST
Maybe justify it - the Facility makes Jem'Haddar happy. When the Jem'Haddar are happy, they don't kill people. When people don't get killed they are happy. Hence, the happier the Jem'Haddar, the happier the populace.

Not perfect logic, but if you want an explaination...
Author:  ScottRV [ 12 Jun 2009, 12:48 ]
Post subject:  Re: EMPIRE STRUCTURE LIST
Have noticed that their has been limited feedback in several years to this thread, so I hope this is the right place to make a notation.

Under the panel "Structures", I have noticed an inconsistentcy between 1 long scrolling screen or a side by side listing of your structures. Which was intended?

While on that thought, I would hope some interest would show that this screen could be in order (i.e., Structures will indicate food bonus items be in the first section, Production bonus items in the second, Energy in the third, etc .. Whereas the look is consistent with the Production screen (Food, production, energy, etc..)

Thanks
Author:  Matress_of_evil [ 12 Jun 2009, 13:07 ]
Post subject:  Re: EMPIRE STRUCTURE LIST
Don't worry about resurrecting old threads, even if they're four years old like this one. It keeps the forums tidier if there are fewer threads anyways.

I've noticed the inconsistency myself, so i'll mention it to Mike. I don't like it scrolling down with individual structures, I prefer the three-columned approach, so I'll see if he can force it that way.

We're always looking for new ideas on how information can be displayed, so i'll ask him about prioritising the structures as well. It's a good idea. :)
Page 3 of 3 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/