View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently 17 Feb 2025, 06:46



Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 Norexan or Valdore 

Norexan or valdore
Poll ended at 22 Oct 2005, 20:39
Norexan 56%  56%  [ 32 ]
Valdore 39%  39%  [ 22 ]
Other 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
Mogai (as suggested by the white raven) 4%  4%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 57

 Norexan or Valdore 
Author Message
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 01:00
Posts: 884
Location: Germany
http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/library/ships/article/123375.html

_________________
"Logic is the beginning of wisdom; not the end." -- Spock (Star Trek VI)

Q: The trial never ended. We never reached a verdict. But now we have. You're guilty. Picard: Guilty of what? Q:Of being inferior.


13 Oct 2005, 13:04
Profile
Crewman
User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 01:00
Posts: 7
Location: Mississauga, ON, CA
Guys, we're not talking about the Galaxy class here. There is currently no info anywere on the web that states the Valdore was the 1st of her class. Additionally, just because the Federation names her classes after the first ship produced doesn't mean another race will.
According to http://www.decipher.com, who owns the rights to the ST CCG and thus anything that is made public must be confirmed by and recieve approval from Paramount, the class name is Norexan. This can also be found on the formentioned http://www.stiff.net, http://www.ditl.org, http://www.memory-alpha.org, http://www.trekwarfare.org, and numberous other sites and forums on the web.


13 Oct 2005, 14:02
Profile
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Lieutenant Junior Grade
User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2005, 01:00
Posts: 208
Location: The netherlands
I think Valdore would be beter because I think its a more popular name than the Norexan......I think.......... :lol:


13 Oct 2005, 14:07
Profile
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2004, 01:00
Posts: 690
Location: UK
The Defiant class was first mentioned in "Dogs Of War"DS9. Although since the Defiant was the first of the class, the class couldn't have been named anything else anyway

Nebula class was mentioned in "The Wounded" DS9

Excelsior class was given in TNG, and also in "Paradise lost" DS9, the Excelsior was obviously Excelsir class.


Nobody ever called the Defiant Escort class or heavy escort class. :lol: :lol: :lol: Ship types are entirely different things to ship classes! The Defiant is an Escort ship, but she's Defiant class, therefore a Defiant class Escort.


Just in case anyone's not familiar with either Star Trek, or ancient naval tradition. The first ship of a new class has the class name. All subsequent vessels are of that class.

The USS Galaxy was seen in "Tears Of The Prophets" DS9, she took a lot of damage, but survived as she was one of the ships waiting to help the Enterprise in Nemesis.

_________________
Who says there's never a Klingon around when you need one.


13 Oct 2005, 14:10
Profile
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 01:00
Posts: 884
Location: Germany
How do you know that the uss galaxy was one of the ships waiting to help the enterprise? Did you zoom into that chart or something?

_________________
"Logic is the beginning of wisdom; not the end." -- Spock (Star Trek VI)

Q: The trial never ended. We never reached a verdict. But now we have. You're guilty. Picard: Guilty of what? Q:Of being inferior.


13 Oct 2005, 14:42
Profile
Crewman
User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 01:00
Posts: 7
Location: Mississauga, ON, CA
I saw the names and registry numbers on my big screen when they zoomed in on the display.


13 Oct 2005, 14:49
Profile
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2004, 01:00
Posts: 690
Location: UK
iwulff wrote:
How do you know that the uss galaxy was one of the ships waiting to help the enterprise? Did you zoom into that chart or something?


I paused my DVD and read them.... I am a nerd. :lol:

_________________
Who says there's never a Klingon around when you need one.


13 Oct 2005, 15:10
Profile
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 01:00
Posts: 884
Location: Germany
well i never got around to do it... i guess i want to know the other ships also. :D

_________________
"Logic is the beginning of wisdom; not the end." -- Spock (Star Trek VI)

Q: The trial never ended. We never reached a verdict. But now we have. You're guilty. Picard: Guilty of what? Q:Of being inferior.


13 Oct 2005, 15:11
Profile
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2004, 01:00
Posts: 690
Location: UK
It's a bit silly actually, like the class reunion of the prototype ships. :lol:

http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Starfle ... roup_Omega

As well as the Galaxy...

The registries for the Nova and the Intrepid are consistent with being the prototypes for the Equinox and Voyager respectively.

The Aries and Hood we've seen before in TNG, both Excelsiors I believe.

The Archer is obviously a tip of the hat to Enterprise. The registry places it around Excelsior/Miranda times.

_________________
Who says there's never a Klingon around when you need one.


13 Oct 2005, 16:04
Profile
Captain
Captain
User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2005, 01:00
Posts: 1657
Location: USS Victory - NCC 362447
It all comes back to the Canon argument :) I wouldn't mind seeing what'd happen the the Schimitar if it faced Omega. Bye Bye Schinzon :lol:

_________________
Star Trek PBEM RPG Group
http://starbase118.net/

Image

Legacy is now here! Buy the XBOX 360 version!


13 Oct 2005, 18:29
Profile WWW
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2004, 01:00
Posts: 538
Location: FL
Phased wrote:
According to http://www.decipher.com, who owns the rights to the ST CCG and thus anything that is made public must be confirmed by and recieve approval from Paramount, the class name is Norexan.


You do realize how laughable that sounds right? Paramount does not give a flying %&@# about Star Trek. At most one person looked that card game over to make sure there was nothing offensive in it, and it was good to go.

By that same line of thinking, any Star Trek book also must meet Pramounts approvial. So, since the name was published in two seperate books as Mogai class, we should go with what paramount says, right... (BTW, in not arguing for that class, I know when I'm beaten, ust trying to make a point here).

Also all the sites you listed. They are all fine sites, but all made by fanboys. Some info is correct, some they just pulled out their asses.

_________________
Si vis pacem para bellum.


14 Oct 2005, 14:50
Profile
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2004, 01:00
Posts: 690
Location: UK
Your logic is flawless Rigel.

At least Valdore has the advantage of having been said on screen.

_________________
Who says there's never a Klingon around when you need one.


14 Oct 2005, 15:08
Profile
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
User avatar

Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 01:00
Posts: 7392
Location: Returned to the previous place.
Based on all that, I still vote Valdore.

As SOM said, the Valdore was named onscreen, so we can't dispute that. We aren't saying the Valdore is the first of the class, and we aren't saying it IS the Valdore class. We're just saying that we'd like to call it the Valdore class for all intents and purposes of the BOTF2 'canon' game.

You have to remember, the 'canon game' will not be 110% loyal to everything that is trek - it will just be as loyal as it can be from a playability point of view. Some changes will have to be made to make it playable.

So does it really matter so much what we call it? If people don't like it, then they can mod their game! So what's the problem? :?

Besides, Valdore sounds more Romulany to me! :lol:

_________________
"Anyone without a sense of humour is truly at the mercy of the rest of us."

Image
Image


14 Oct 2005, 17:00
Profile WWW
Captain
Captain
User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2005, 01:00
Posts: 1657
Location: USS Victory - NCC 362447
:lol: , If the game was completely canon it would probably be a lot more boring

_________________
Star Trek PBEM RPG Group
http://starbase118.net/

Image

Legacy is now here! Buy the XBOX 360 version!


14 Oct 2005, 17:24
Profile WWW
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2005, 01:00
Posts: 652
Location: HRVATSKA
Same difference. Norexan just sounds better to me when I say it together with D'Deridex :P

EDIT: as if it'll make a difference if my battle summary says "40 Norexan Warbirds destroyed" od "40 Valdore Warbirds destroyed" :twisted:


Last edited by CVN-65 on 14 Oct 2005, 21:00, edited 1 time in total.



14 Oct 2005, 19:10
Profile
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: 02 Apr 2005, 01:00
Posts: 373
Location: Ch'Rihann, Romulus system
Valdore it is, then. Though I realy do not care much. They both sound Romulan enough to me. :)

_________________
Never dispatch your entire armada into a single battle, never decloak the entire fleet before assaulting and never have all your ships attack and move simultaneously.
-Global Military Directive


14 Oct 2005, 19:16
Profile
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Lieutenant Junior Grade
User avatar

Joined: 31 Oct 2004, 01:00
Posts: 213
Location: PEI, Canada
Matress_of_evil wrote:
You have to remember, the 'canon game' will not be 110% loyal to everything that is trek - it will just be as loyal as it can be from a playability point of view. Some changes will have to be made to make it playable.

So does it really matter so much what we call it? If people don't like it, then they can mod their game! So what's the problem? :?


I completely agree with this even though I suggested adding the Mogai name. I just did it because I felt like if we were going to vote on it we should have all the mentioned names before we started. I actually voted for Norexan. (IMO the baddest Rommy ships should always have one "x" in their class name. 8) It makes it easier for my Negh'Vars' targeting sensors when they just have to target all ships with the letter "x" in them :lol: )

_________________
Core 2 Duo E6400 OCed to 2.55GHz
Intel D975XBX "Bad Axe" Mobo
2GB DDR2 667 RAM
250GB SATA and 200GB IDE Hard drives
ATI Radeon X1900XTX w/512MB
19" 16x10 Moniter
_______
Banana Banana Banana Banana Terracotta Banana Terracotta, Terracotta Pie!!!


15 Oct 2005, 01:29
Profile YIM WWW
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
User avatar

Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 01:00
Posts: 7392
Location: Returned to the previous place.
Fine then, i'll just target...your apostrophes! :twisted: :lol:

You are right though, there wouldn't be any point in having a poll with only half the options available! 8O :lol:

_________________
"Anyone without a sense of humour is truly at the mercy of the rest of us."

Image
Image


15 Oct 2005, 11:21
Profile WWW
Jig of the Puff
Jig of the Puff
User avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2004, 01:00
Posts: 1305
Location: I wish i knew
well i set the poll to run 10 days and so far norexan is way out in front.

_________________
ImageImage


15 Oct 2005, 11:38
Profile
Cadet
Cadet
User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2005, 01:00
Posts: 94
Yeah I think it sounds best, and in terms of Canon-ness, they both could be used, so Norexan wins on name alone


15 Oct 2005, 11:41
Profile
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
User avatar

Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 01:00
Posts: 7392
Location: Returned to the previous place.
Oh well, Norexan it is then.

Like I said, it can be changed anyway, so it doesn't exactly matter too much. :wink:

_________________
"Anyone without a sense of humour is truly at the mercy of the rest of us."

Image
Image


15 Oct 2005, 12:05
Profile WWW
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Lieutenant Junior Grade
User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2005, 01:00
Posts: 208
Location: The netherlands
And when you see the ship everyone nows what class it is wheter it is Norexan or valdore :wink:


16 Oct 2005, 14:17
Profile
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2005, 01:00
Posts: 652
Location: HRVATSKA
Adm_Willie wrote:
And when you see the ship everyone nows what class it is wheter it is Norexan or valdore :wink:

Well, yes. That is, if they manage to see it before my photons turn it into SRSD. :wink: :lol:


16 Oct 2005, 14:29
Profile
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Lieutenant Junior Grade
User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2005, 01:00
Posts: 208
Location: The netherlands
8O Photons????My quantums will rip your ship and the Valdore\Norexan into tiny peaces :lol:


17 Oct 2005, 09:32
Profile
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 2005, 01:00
Posts: 309
Location: Florida, USA
Naval Ship Classes/Designations are set up as this

Class:
Military Designation:
Designation Run:
Ship Name:

So as look at the U.S.S. Enterprise CVN-65

Class: Nimitz
Military Designation: Aircraft Carrier
Designation Run: 65
Ship Name U.S.S. Enterprise
-----
The U.S.S. Defiant (Star Trek)

Class: Defiant
Military Designation: Heavy Escort
Designation Run: NX
Ship Name: U.S.S. Defiant

I'm sure there is no U.S.S. Heavy Escort floating around in ST.

So as for the Norexan/Valdore why can't we go as follows

Class: Valdore
Military Designation: Heavy Cruiser
Designation Run: (Dev's Magic)
Ship Name: Norexan


17 Oct 2005, 14:20
Profile WWW
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: 02 Apr 2005, 01:00
Posts: 373
Location: Ch'Rihann, Romulus system
We can't go with that as we go with the following (as concluded from the poll):

Class: Norexan
Military Designation: Warbird II
Designation Run: (Dev's Magic)
Ship Name: R.N.S. Valdore

_________________
Never dispatch your entire armada into a single battle, never decloak the entire fleet before assaulting and never have all your ships attack and move simultaneously.
-Global Military Directive


17 Oct 2005, 16:13
Profile
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 2005, 01:00
Posts: 309
Location: Florida, USA
that works also, but using Warbird is kind of a Nic-name it is like a US Fighter Pilot calling out a MiG on his six. Warbird or BOP would be calling the same thing. their Military would be like i.e. attack cruiser, or fighter, bomber etc.


17 Oct 2005, 16:57
Profile WWW
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2004, 01:00
Posts: 538
Location: FL
You guys are just going back and forth on semantical bs. From the poll, shes gonn be the Norexan no matter what you make her military designation. :P

_________________
Si vis pacem para bellum.


17 Oct 2005, 17:16
Profile
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: 02 Apr 2005, 01:00
Posts: 373
Location: Ch'Rihann, Romulus system
Ship class != Military Designation.
As Valcoren explained in his posts, a military designation is more like the 'role' of a ship. i.e. rairder, cruiser, heavy cruiser, warbird.

A Warbird, Valcoren, is a designation just as a Cruiser is. As shown here. Stop thinking like a Human! :lol: The Norexan is as much a Warbird as a D'Deridex. I even think that the 'Bird of Prey' is a designation as well. The class name of it would be the B'rel. You could probably assign the K'Vort the same designation ;)

_________________
Never dispatch your entire armada into a single battle, never decloak the entire fleet before assaulting and never have all your ships attack and move simultaneously.
-Global Military Directive


17 Oct 2005, 18:04
Profile
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 2005, 01:00
Posts: 309
Location: Florida, USA
we are aware of the poll and I personally have no problem with the naming. I would like to see something like this though when targeting a ship that the sensors pick up on.

Class:
Military Designation:
Designation Run:
Ship Name:


17 Oct 2005, 18:14
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by STSoftware.