Author |
Message |
iwulff
Fleet Admiral
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 01:00 Posts: 884 Location: Germany
|
_________________ "Logic is the beginning of wisdom; not the end." -- Spock (Star Trek VI)
Q: The trial never ended. We never reached a verdict. But now we have. You're guilty. Picard: Guilty of what? Q:Of being inferior.
|
13 Oct 2005, 13:04 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Phased
Crewman
Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 01:00 Posts: 7 Location: Mississauga, ON, CA
|
Guys, we're not talking about the Galaxy class here. There is currently no info anywere on the web that states the Valdore was the 1st of her class. Additionally, just because the Federation names her classes after the first ship produced doesn't mean another race will.
According to http://www.decipher.com, who owns the rights to the ST CCG and thus anything that is made public must be confirmed by and recieve approval from Paramount, the class name is Norexan. This can also be found on the formentioned http://www.stiff.net, http://www.ditl.org, http://www.memory-alpha.org, http://www.trekwarfare.org, and numberous other sites and forums on the web.
|
13 Oct 2005, 14:02 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Adm_Willie
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined: 27 Sep 2005, 01:00 Posts: 208 Location: The netherlands
|
I think Valdore would be beter because I think its a more popular name than the Norexan......I think.......... ![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
|
13 Oct 2005, 14:07 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
SonOfMogh
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 20 Sep 2004, 01:00 Posts: 690 Location: UK
|
The Defiant class was first mentioned in "Dogs Of War"DS9. Although since the Defiant was the first of the class, the class couldn't have been named anything else anyway
Nebula class was mentioned in "The Wounded" DS9
Excelsior class was given in TNG, and also in "Paradise lost" DS9, the Excelsior was obviously Excelsir class.
Nobody ever called the Defiant Escort class or heavy escort class. ![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif) Ship types are entirely different things to ship classes! The Defiant is an Escort ship, but she's Defiant class, therefore a Defiant class Escort.
Just in case anyone's not familiar with either Star Trek, or ancient naval tradition. The first ship of a new class has the class name. All subsequent vessels are of that class.
The USS Galaxy was seen in "Tears Of The Prophets" DS9, she took a lot of damage, but survived as she was one of the ships waiting to help the Enterprise in Nemesis.
_________________ Who says there's never a Klingon around when you need one.
|
13 Oct 2005, 14:10 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
iwulff
Fleet Admiral
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 01:00 Posts: 884 Location: Germany
|
How do you know that the uss galaxy was one of the ships waiting to help the enterprise? Did you zoom into that chart or something?
_________________ "Logic is the beginning of wisdom; not the end." -- Spock (Star Trek VI)
Q: The trial never ended. We never reached a verdict. But now we have. You're guilty. Picard: Guilty of what? Q:Of being inferior.
|
13 Oct 2005, 14:42 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Phased
Crewman
Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 01:00 Posts: 7 Location: Mississauga, ON, CA
|
I saw the names and registry numbers on my big screen when they zoomed in on the display.
|
13 Oct 2005, 14:49 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
SonOfMogh
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 20 Sep 2004, 01:00 Posts: 690 Location: UK
|
iwulff wrote: How do you know that the uss galaxy was one of the ships waiting to help the enterprise? Did you zoom into that chart or something?
I paused my DVD and read them.... I am a nerd. ![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
_________________ Who says there's never a Klingon around when you need one.
|
13 Oct 2005, 15:10 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
iwulff
Fleet Admiral
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 01:00 Posts: 884 Location: Germany
|
well i never got around to do it... i guess i want to know the other ships also. ![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
_________________ "Logic is the beginning of wisdom; not the end." -- Spock (Star Trek VI)
Q: The trial never ended. We never reached a verdict. But now we have. You're guilty. Picard: Guilty of what? Q:Of being inferior.
|
13 Oct 2005, 15:11 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
SonOfMogh
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 20 Sep 2004, 01:00 Posts: 690 Location: UK
|
It's a bit silly actually, like the class reunion of the prototype ships.
http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Starfle ... roup_Omega
As well as the Galaxy...
The registries for the Nova and the Intrepid are consistent with being the prototypes for the Equinox and Voyager respectively.
The Aries and Hood we've seen before in TNG, both Excelsiors I believe.
The Archer is obviously a tip of the hat to Enterprise. The registry places it around Excelsior/Miranda times.
_________________ Who says there's never a Klingon around when you need one.
|
13 Oct 2005, 16:04 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
TrekBoyChris
Captain
Joined: 17 Jun 2005, 01:00 Posts: 1657 Location: USS Victory - NCC 362447
|
It all comes back to the Canon argument ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif) I wouldn't mind seeing what'd happen the the Schimitar if it faced Omega. Bye Bye Schinzon ![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
_________________Star Trek PBEM RPG Group
http://starbase118.net/
Legacy is now here! Buy the XBOX 360 version!
|
13 Oct 2005, 18:29 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Rigel
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 15 Nov 2004, 01:00 Posts: 538 Location: FL
|
Phased wrote: According to http://www.decipher.com, who owns the rights to the ST CCG and thus anything that is made public must be confirmed by and recieve approval from Paramount, the class name is Norexan.
You do realize how laughable that sounds right? Paramount does not give a flying %&@# about Star Trek. At most one person looked that card game over to make sure there was nothing offensive in it, and it was good to go.
By that same line of thinking, any Star Trek book also must meet Pramounts approvial. So, since the name was published in two seperate books as Mogai class, we should go with what paramount says, right... (BTW, in not arguing for that class, I know when I'm beaten, ust trying to make a point here).
Also all the sites you listed. They are all fine sites, but all made by fanboys. Some info is correct, some they just pulled out their asses.
_________________ Si vis pacem para bellum.
|
14 Oct 2005, 14:50 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
SonOfMogh
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 20 Sep 2004, 01:00 Posts: 690 Location: UK
|
Your logic is flawless Rigel.
At least Valdore has the advantage of having been said on screen.
_________________ Who says there's never a Klingon around when you need one.
|
14 Oct 2005, 15:08 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Matress_of_evil
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 01:00 Posts: 7392 Location: Returned to the previous place.
|
Based on all that, I still vote Valdore.
As SOM said, the Valdore was named onscreen, so we can't dispute that. We aren't saying the Valdore is the first of the class, and we aren't saying it IS the Valdore class. We're just saying that we'd like to call it the Valdore class for all intents and purposes of the BOTF2 'canon' game.
You have to remember, the 'canon game' will not be 110% loyal to everything that is trek - it will just be as loyal as it can be from a playability point of view. Some changes will have to be made to make it playable.
So does it really matter so much what we call it? If people don't like it, then they can mod their game! So what's the problem?
Besides, Valdore sounds more Romulany to me! ![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
_________________"Anyone without a sense of humour is truly at the mercy of the rest of us." ![Image](http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/sigs/sigimage.php?t=46574&c1=FFFFFF&c2=000000&c3=000000&c4=0000CC&c5=FFFFFF) ![Image](http://star-trek-games.com/images/Supremacy_banner_smaller.jpg)
|
14 Oct 2005, 17:00 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
TrekBoyChris
Captain
Joined: 17 Jun 2005, 01:00 Posts: 1657 Location: USS Victory - NCC 362447
|
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif) , If the game was completely canon it would probably be a lot more boring
_________________Star Trek PBEM RPG Group
http://starbase118.net/
Legacy is now here! Buy the XBOX 360 version!
|
14 Oct 2005, 17:24 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
CVN-65
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 21 Jan 2005, 01:00 Posts: 652 Location: HRVATSKA
|
Same difference. Norexan just sounds better to me when I say it together with D'Deridex
EDIT: as if it'll make a difference if my battle summary says "40 Norexan Warbirds destroyed" od "40 Valdore Warbirds destroyed" ![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
Last edited by CVN-65 on 14 Oct 2005, 21:00, edited 1 time in total.
|
14 Oct 2005, 19:10 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Centurion_VarDin
Lieutenant
Joined: 02 Apr 2005, 01:00 Posts: 373 Location: Ch'Rihann, Romulus system
|
Valdore it is, then. Though I realy do not care much. They both sound Romulan enough to me. ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
_________________ Never dispatch your entire armada into a single battle, never decloak the entire fleet before assaulting and never have all your ships attack and move simultaneously.
-Global Military Directive
|
14 Oct 2005, 19:16 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
TheWhiteRaven
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined: 31 Oct 2004, 01:00 Posts: 213 Location: PEI, Canada
|
Matress_of_evil wrote: You have to remember, the 'canon game' will not be 110% loyal to everything that is trek - it will just be as loyal as it can be from a playability point of view. Some changes will have to be made to make it playable. So does it really matter so much what we call it? If people don't like it, then they can mod their game! So what's the problem? ![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
I completely agree with this even though I suggested adding the Mogai name. I just did it because I felt like if we were going to vote on it we should have all the mentioned names before we started. I actually voted for Norexan. (IMO the baddest Rommy ships should always have one "x" in their class name. ![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif) It makes it easier for my Negh'Vars' targeting sensors when they just have to target all ships with the letter "x" in them ![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif) )
_________________ Core 2 Duo E6400 OCed to 2.55GHz
Intel D975XBX "Bad Axe" Mobo
2GB DDR2 667 RAM
250GB SATA and 200GB IDE Hard drives
ATI Radeon X1900XTX w/512MB
19" 16x10 Moniter
_______
Banana Banana Banana Banana Terracotta Banana Terracotta, Terracotta Pie!!!
|
15 Oct 2005, 01:29 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Matress_of_evil
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 01:00 Posts: 7392 Location: Returned to the previous place.
|
Fine then, i'll just target...your apostrophes!
You are right though, there wouldn't be any point in having a poll with only half the options available! 8O ![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
_________________"Anyone without a sense of humour is truly at the mercy of the rest of us." ![Image](http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/sigs/sigimage.php?t=46574&c1=FFFFFF&c2=000000&c3=000000&c4=0000CC&c5=FFFFFF) ![Image](http://star-trek-games.com/images/Supremacy_banner_smaller.jpg)
|
15 Oct 2005, 11:21 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
jigalypuff
Jig of the Puff
Joined: 10 Sep 2004, 01:00 Posts: 1305 Location: I wish i knew
|
well i set the poll to run 10 days and so far norexan is way out in front.
_________________![Image](http://www.star-trek-mods.com/images/sigs/banner_1.jpg) ![Image](http://www.star-trek-mods.com/images/sigs/banner_2.jpg)
|
15 Oct 2005, 11:38 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Coopa
Cadet
Joined: 24 Sep 2005, 01:00 Posts: 94
|
Yeah I think it sounds best, and in terms of Canon-ness, they both could be used, so Norexan wins on name alone
|
15 Oct 2005, 11:41 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Matress_of_evil
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 01:00 Posts: 7392 Location: Returned to the previous place.
|
Oh well, Norexan it is then.
Like I said, it can be changed anyway, so it doesn't exactly matter too much. ![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
_________________"Anyone without a sense of humour is truly at the mercy of the rest of us." ![Image](http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/sigs/sigimage.php?t=46574&c1=FFFFFF&c2=000000&c3=000000&c4=0000CC&c5=FFFFFF) ![Image](http://star-trek-games.com/images/Supremacy_banner_smaller.jpg)
|
15 Oct 2005, 12:05 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Adm_Willie
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined: 27 Sep 2005, 01:00 Posts: 208 Location: The netherlands
|
And when you see the ship everyone nows what class it is wheter it is Norexan or valdore ![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
|
16 Oct 2005, 14:17 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
CVN-65
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 21 Jan 2005, 01:00 Posts: 652 Location: HRVATSKA
|
Adm_Willie wrote: And when you see the ship everyone nows what class it is wheter it is Norexan or valdore ![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Well, yes. That is, if they manage to see it before my photons turn it into SRSD. ![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
|
16 Oct 2005, 14:29 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Adm_Willie
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined: 27 Sep 2005, 01:00 Posts: 208 Location: The netherlands
|
8O Photons????My quantums will rip your ship and the Valdore\Norexan into tiny peaces ![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
|
17 Oct 2005, 09:32 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Valcoren
Lieutenant
Joined: 10 Aug 2005, 01:00 Posts: 309 Location: Florida, USA
|
Naval Ship Classes/Designations are set up as this
Class:
Military Designation:
Designation Run:
Ship Name:
So as look at the U.S.S. Enterprise CVN-65
Class: Nimitz
Military Designation: Aircraft Carrier
Designation Run: 65
Ship Name U.S.S. Enterprise
-----
The U.S.S. Defiant (Star Trek)
Class: Defiant
Military Designation: Heavy Escort
Designation Run: NX
Ship Name: U.S.S. Defiant
I'm sure there is no U.S.S. Heavy Escort floating around in ST.
So as for the Norexan/Valdore why can't we go as follows
Class: Valdore
Military Designation: Heavy Cruiser
Designation Run: (Dev's Magic)
Ship Name: Norexan
|
17 Oct 2005, 14:20 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Centurion_VarDin
Lieutenant
Joined: 02 Apr 2005, 01:00 Posts: 373 Location: Ch'Rihann, Romulus system
|
We can't go with that as we go with the following (as concluded from the poll):
Class: Norexan
Military Designation: Warbird II
Designation Run: (Dev's Magic)
Ship Name: R.N.S. Valdore
_________________ Never dispatch your entire armada into a single battle, never decloak the entire fleet before assaulting and never have all your ships attack and move simultaneously.
-Global Military Directive
|
17 Oct 2005, 16:13 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Valcoren
Lieutenant
Joined: 10 Aug 2005, 01:00 Posts: 309 Location: Florida, USA
|
that works also, but using Warbird is kind of a Nic-name it is like a US Fighter Pilot calling out a MiG on his six. Warbird or BOP would be calling the same thing. their Military would be like i.e. attack cruiser, or fighter, bomber etc.
|
17 Oct 2005, 16:57 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Rigel
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 15 Nov 2004, 01:00 Posts: 538 Location: FL
|
You guys are just going back and forth on semantical bs. From the poll, shes gonn be the Norexan no matter what you make her military designation. ![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
_________________ Si vis pacem para bellum.
|
17 Oct 2005, 17:16 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Centurion_VarDin
Lieutenant
Joined: 02 Apr 2005, 01:00 Posts: 373 Location: Ch'Rihann, Romulus system
|
Ship class != Military Designation.
As Valcoren explained in his posts, a military designation is more like the 'role' of a ship. i.e. rairder, cruiser, heavy cruiser, warbird.
A Warbird, Valcoren, is a designation just as a Cruiser is. As shown here. Stop thinking like a Human! ![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif) The Norexan is as much a Warbird as a D'Deridex. I even think that the 'Bird of Prey' is a designation as well. The class name of it would be the B'rel. You could probably assign the K'Vort the same designation ![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
_________________ Never dispatch your entire armada into a single battle, never decloak the entire fleet before assaulting and never have all your ships attack and move simultaneously.
-Global Military Directive
|
17 Oct 2005, 18:04 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
Valcoren
Lieutenant
Joined: 10 Aug 2005, 01:00 Posts: 309 Location: Florida, USA
|
we are aware of the poll and I personally have no problem with the naming. I would like to see something like this though when targeting a ship that the sensors pick up on.
Class:
Military Designation:
Designation Run:
Ship Name:
|
17 Oct 2005, 18:14 |
|
![](./styles/acidtech/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
|