I believe that affected row number is still a bit stingy ..
| Star Trek Fan Games http://bote2.square7.ch/forum/ |
|
| AFC sites restored? http://bote2.square7.ch/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1691 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | skeeter [ 08 Apr 2007, 11:07 ] |
| Post subject: | AFC sites restored? |
Has the new server been found and used allready is that why the whole of afc was down yesterday because it was all being transfered to a new server? |
|
| Author: | zach21uk [ 08 Apr 2007, 11:12 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
AFC was down cos the hosting company (managed.com) has gone bust, Last i heard they are still looking for a new host, but money is a problem. |
|
| Author: | jigalypuff [ 08 Apr 2007, 12:07 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
i have sent afc a message via icq and am waiting on his response. once i know were we stand with a server i`ll inform everyone, zack as i said in the pm it`ll be up to mike if he wants to migrate to a new site but if server trouble continues then i suppose it`d be the sensible thing to do. personally i`d like to keep everything here. |
|
| Author: | zach21uk [ 08 Apr 2007, 12:26 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
The offer is there if you need it. |
|
| Author: | Matress_of_evil [ 09 Apr 2007, 18:41 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
| Author: | zach21uk [ 09 Apr 2007, 20:59 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
| Author: | Azhdeen [ 10 Apr 2007, 14:28 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
delete from tblForumPosts where user = 'Matress_of_evil' (5439841897532145890 row(s) affected) Oh, you said inactive users? Whoops. |
|
| Author: | Malvoisin [ 10 Apr 2007, 14:31 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
I believe that affected row number is still a bit stingy ..
|
|
| Author: | mstrobel [ 10 Apr 2007, 16:23 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
| Author: | Kenneth_of_Borg [ 10 Apr 2007, 19:23 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
lol, I think they were talking about inactive users - not silly users. |
|
| Author: | Nemitor_Atimen [ 10 Apr 2007, 21:05 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
I think that pruning inactive users would be very bad. We would go to 2368 to under 100 in a matter of seconds. Big numbers = good. |
|
| Author: | Zeleni [ 11 Apr 2007, 01:58 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
| Author: | Matress_of_evil [ 12 Apr 2007, 17:44 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
This site now needs a few new emoticons - I demand emoticative revenge against Azhdeen! 
And if you check, my post count is only 3435...3436...*ahem* If the site is going to keep dying like this, we really are going to have to consider new servers. I doubt the lurkers would be very happy with a dead or dying site - and neither do we. 
|
|
| Author: | jigalypuff [ 12 Apr 2007, 20:43 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
things were being moved around moe, everything should be on track now. |
|
| Author: | Kenneth_of_Borg [ 12 Apr 2007, 21:48 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
Thanks to you Admiral - We all depend on you. |
|
| Author: | Winterhawk [ 15 Apr 2007, 21:50 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
so were safe from total deletation????? lol Of course deleting just matresses posts would open up about 3000 Gig of storage space.  
|
|
| Author: | CaptRingold [ 29 Apr 2007, 06:58 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
Down time makes me sad. |
|
| Author: | Matress_of_evil [ 29 Apr 2007, 10:48 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
Suicidal tendencies falling... *ahh...* |
|
| Author: | cdrwolfe [ 29 Apr 2007, 13:18 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
So any news on the server, and whether downtime will be a regular thing? |
|
| Author: | mstrobel [ 29 Apr 2007, 13:39 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
I don't think the "bandwidth exceeded" issue has anything to do with moving servers. We're probably just generating too much traffic. |
|
| Author: | Malvoisin [ 29 Apr 2007, 14:38 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
well if it was 1st of may already I'd agree but why would the site be open again before the month is over unless someone paid some extra money? just a quick question that came to my mind, why different servers for regular botf and armada afc and botf2 (downloads of bote already run over the botf1 afc site!)? Last time only the botf2 site was down and looking at site stats, I don't think we generate that much traffic just by the 3000 page visits a day.. |
|
| Author: | jigalypuff [ 29 Apr 2007, 16:10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
were useing the botf site for downloads due to a scripting error in this site which causes dl`s from here to fail, dunno why this is. bandwidth exceded was from the move, afc set it wrong for this site. |
|
| Author: | CaptRingold [ 30 Apr 2007, 06:32 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AFC sites restored? |
It sure slowed the pace of conversation down around here, being down for those few days (it was finals week for me, so maybe it was longer, it's all a big time warp to me). I guess it might take a week or so for everybody to realize it's up again. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|