Author |
Message |
EnterpriseNX_01
Crewman
Joined: 18 Sep 2005, 01:00 Posts: 12
|
I have absolutely no idea of this subject/ship has ever come up but.....Is this little ship gonna be in the game?? If not, I'm hoping someone makes a mod.
Anyways....I personally found this ship interesting because of the borg tech that was incorporated in to it, i.e. borgified torpedos. Its bigger than a shuttlecraft and somewhat of a recon/fighter vessel.
Thoughts anyone
|
01 Oct 2005, 03:34 |
|
|
Centurion_VarDin
Lieutenant
Joined: 02 Apr 2005, 01:00 Posts: 373 Location: Ch'Rihann, Romulus system
|
Sorry to disappoint you, but there will be no shuttles or fighters in the game.
_________________ Never dispatch your entire armada into a single battle, never decloak the entire fleet before assaulting and never have all your ships attack and move simultaneously.
-Global Military Directive
|
01 Oct 2005, 05:38 |
|
|
iwulff
Fleet Admiral
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 01:00 Posts: 884 Location: Germany
|
Centurion_VarDin wrote: Sorry to disappoint you, but there will be no shuttles or fighters in the game. First of all you could put it in yourselve in a mod, by asking a modeller who made one to give it to you. If he/she agrees then you are free to go. With gmax you can do alot without any problem and it's free.
btw. Don't use models without permission of the creator.
_________________ "Logic is the beginning of wisdom; not the end." -- Spock (Star Trek VI)
Q: The trial never ended. We never reached a verdict. But now we have. You're guilty. Picard: Guilty of what? Q:Of being inferior.
|
01 Oct 2005, 08:10 |
|
|
TrekBoyChris
Captain
Joined: 17 Jun 2005, 01:00 Posts: 1657 Location: USS Victory - NCC 362447
|
Just as a query, why aren't there going to be any shuttles/fighters in the game?
_________________Star Trek PBEM RPG Group
http://starbase118.net/
Legacy is now here! Buy the XBOX 360 version!
|
01 Oct 2005, 10:38 |
|
|
CVN-65
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 21 Jan 2005, 01:00 Posts: 652 Location: HRVATSKA
|
Well, here's my interpretation.
Shuttles are small and can't achieve high warp, therefore they must be based on larger ships. A large ship carrying a large number of smaller assult vessels brings us to the "C" word
( carrier)
Maybe that's the reason...
In any case, they are small and, basicaly, insignificant.
And honestly, in a game of galactic conquest who cares about shuttlecraft Chochrane?
_________________
|
01 Oct 2005, 10:55 |
|
|
Scatter
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined: 31 Oct 2004, 01:00 Posts: 284
|
there's a term games creators use - it's called feature creep.
it's used when the game becomes so bloated with "features" that it is an almost unintelligable mess. for some time, my biggest fear in regards to this project is just that - feature creep.
ask yourself - what purpose would having shuttles in the game serve besides the "oh wow, they've even got shuttles in there." if the serve no important purpose to the overall game, there's no real need, imho.
|
01 Oct 2005, 11:56 |
|
|
ukulele
Crewman
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 01:00 Posts: 47 Location: Germany, NRW
|
tactical combat must even be handable, and with big ships in between shuttles just would slow down speed and difficult to command
maybe these litte sulobon vessels would be interesting, like a swarm and command as one ship but... as scatter said, dont overload
|
01 Oct 2005, 13:47 |
|
|
Thom
Ensign
Joined: 24 Sep 2005, 01:00 Posts: 127 Location: Scotland
|
those sobin pods are the sobins only ships but they rock they fly all over you and they shoot you from everywhere!
|
01 Oct 2005, 14:09 |
|
|
TrekBoyChris
Captain
Joined: 17 Jun 2005, 01:00 Posts: 1657 Location: USS Victory - NCC 362447
|
I suppose in the future we could make a mod some shuttles though, as iwulff siggested
_________________Star Trek PBEM RPG Group
http://starbase118.net/
Legacy is now here! Buy the XBOX 360 version!
|
01 Oct 2005, 15:15 |
|
|
Coopa
Cadet
Joined: 24 Sep 2005, 01:00 Posts: 94
|
If ground battles are playable in a future release then shuttles will be in at that point I have no doubt
|
01 Oct 2005, 15:17 |
|
|
TrekBoyChris
Captain
Joined: 17 Jun 2005, 01:00 Posts: 1657 Location: USS Victory - NCC 362447
|
umm, Shuttles vs Plasma Grenades .
Be good if we could have a 3d Half Life Engine for the 3d Combat
_________________Star Trek PBEM RPG Group
http://starbase118.net/
Legacy is now here! Buy the XBOX 360 version!
|
01 Oct 2005, 15:25 |
|
|
Matress_of_evil
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 01:00 Posts: 7392 Location: Returned to the previous place.
|
I think Jig said once that anything smaller than a Oberth/Defiant/B'rel/Shrike would be pointless from a battle point of view, because the ships would be too small to see!
Remember that the 'battlefield' will be around 3 times larger than anything in BOTF, so sizes and distances will matter far more ingame.
Afterall, it's pointless having a ship that is too small to see or fight!
_________________"Anyone without a sense of humour is truly at the mercy of the rest of us."
|
01 Oct 2005, 19:56 |
|
|
TrekBoyChris
Captain
Joined: 17 Jun 2005, 01:00 Posts: 1657 Location: USS Victory - NCC 362447
|
lol, if its too small to see and has a couple of good rocket launchers it's gonna do a fair bit of damage
_________________Star Trek PBEM RPG Group
http://starbase118.net/
Legacy is now here! Buy the XBOX 360 version!
|
01 Oct 2005, 20:11 |
|
|
Matress_of_evil
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 01:00 Posts: 7392 Location: Returned to the previous place.
|
That may be so, but it won't be very impressive when they impact against an enemies shields!
"Oh look, I swatted a bug...a rocket-launching bug" 8O
_________________"Anyone without a sense of humour is truly at the mercy of the rest of us."
|
01 Oct 2005, 21:43 |
|
|
TrekBoyChris
Captain
Joined: 17 Jun 2005, 01:00 Posts: 1657 Location: USS Victory - NCC 362447
|
Depends how crap the shields are. In TMP era - 2 or 3 photons and the Shields were down
_________________Star Trek PBEM RPG Group
http://starbase118.net/
Legacy is now here! Buy the XBOX 360 version!
|
01 Oct 2005, 21:45 |
|
|
|