Author |
Message |
CVN-65
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 21 Jan 2005, 01:00 Posts: 652 Location: HRVATSKA
|
Adm_Willie wrote: Maybe with transphasic torpedo's!!! .......But then your right but which ship can??........even a sovereign is no match for a cube\tactical cube......LOL
A semi-retarted duck with more hair that brain (khm. VOYAGER!) can beat the Borg with transphasic torpedos.
Seriously, those thing were invincible.
Ah, all I need is a Defiant with transphasics, and exploding Warbirds to steer her by
That's my second fav ship
|
17 Oct 2005, 18:43 |
|
|
Rigel
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 15 Nov 2004, 01:00 Posts: 538 Location: FL
|
CVN-65 wrote: That's my second fav ship Which, the defiant or the exploding warbirds?
_________________ Si vis pacem para bellum.
|
17 Oct 2005, 18:51 |
|
|
CVN-65
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 21 Jan 2005, 01:00 Posts: 652 Location: HRVATSKA
|
Rigel wrote: CVN-65 wrote: That's my second fav ship Which, the defiant or the exploding warbirds?
Preferably,... a combination of the two
Which, you'll notice, will happen quite often in BotF2
|
17 Oct 2005, 20:01 |
|
|
Bizza
Crewman
Joined: 26 Oct 2005, 01:00 Posts: 2
|
Trek:
Constitution (Refit)
Excelsior
Defiant
Sovereign
Romulan Warbird
Non-Trek:
Narn Heavy Crusier (B5)
Shadow Ship (B5)
Cylon basestar (new BSG)
Sulaco (Aliens)
Super Star Destroyer (Star Wars)
|
26 Oct 2005, 23:48 |
|
|
Jarok
Ensign
Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 01:00 Posts: 165 Location: Lincoln, NE
|
Give me a Nebula with a (new, triangular) sensor pod and I'll come back in five years with a nicely charted quadrant and a computer core full of scientific discoveries.
Plus, it's adaptable, so I could kick a$$ if I needed to, just strap on a tactical pod. Then I could host a diplomatic conference.
But I'd have to say that the co-favorite ship ever has to be the Galaxy. It is the perfect summation of Trek's values, ideals, and idea of what an explorer should be. It just never really got around to being an explorer, because of its usefulness as a capital ship. So, gauging by actual use, the Nebula is my favorite.
So without further ado, here is my list:
1. Nebula
2. Galaxy
3. Excelsior
4. Constitution refit
5. Intrepid
And with that, I'm proud to have made Lieutenant! =/\=
_________________ "With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
Jean-Luc Picard, quoting judge Aaron Satie
Last edited by Jarok on 18 Jan 2006, 07:55, edited 2 times in total.
|
16 Jan 2006, 23:59 |
|
|
Jarok
Ensign
Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 01:00 Posts: 165 Location: Lincoln, NE
|
Non Federation:
1. D'Deridex class Warbird (duh)
2. Vor'Cha class attack cruiser
3. Galor class cruiser
4. Varro multi-generational ship
5. Krenim Timeship
_________________ "With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
Jean-Luc Picard, quoting judge Aaron Satie
|
17 Jan 2006, 00:03 |
|
|
ZDarby
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined: 22 Nov 2004, 01:00 Posts: 201 Location: Nor Cal
|
The Galaxy is not my favorite, but I do wish to come to it's defense.
As is true of the Connie-TOS and Connie-Re, the mass of the ship is properly placed: right between the three impulse engines and near the same plane as the fore-tips of the warp nacells. (I did not believe this when I first saw the ship, but I have a plastic model I experimented upon and it turned out to be true! I was amazed.) The size of the saucer compaired to the Engineering section is pretty much necessary because of the families: you need a lot of space for families (which I always thought were a bad idea, but it seems they wanted it for plot reasons) and making a saucer a little larger greatly increases volume, especially with the sizes we're talking about. But the masses work, it had to be squashed fore-&-aft. And yet, with the saucer separated, close to the same mass rules had to apply the engineering section! Amazingly, it does: the single impulse drive is in the right place and, though the center of mass is no longer at the for-tips of the nacells, it is about the same plane as where the warp coils would start - probably close enough. (Again, I was truly amazed at this discovery. It has a lot to do with the compactness of the engineering hull where it connects to the saucer.) As to the curves, those curved surfaces are far stronger than the angles of the Connies or the Excellcior! And though I wouldn't say they're perfect, eye-sweet curves, I would not say they're horrifically unattractive. And when you consider the engineering challenges involved in making such an HUGE ship that could come apart into two pieces, I'd say they made a wonderful compromise between beauty and engineering.
I gave my opinions as to my favorites before... I'll see if I can find them... sometime later.
_________________ No. I'm not back.
|
17 Jan 2006, 04:19 |
|
|
HHornblower
Crewman
Joined: 05 Nov 2004, 01:00 Posts: 37
|
For those looking for a more Federation starship class bests, look at this link here from much earlier in the forums http://botfii.armadafleetcommand.com/index.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=88&postdays=0&postorder=asc&&start=0
As for me, I love the Romulan Warbird. Gotta love that ship.
Top 10 All Star Trek List: 10 to 1
Galor
Dominion Fighter (Bug)
Soveriegn
Akira
Bajoran Solar Sail
Miranda
Ferengi Marauder
Valdore/Mogai/Norexxen
Constitution Refit
D'Deridex. Just gotta love it, or it blows you up
_________________ Your obedient and humble servant to command,
H. Hornblower
|
18 Jan 2006, 04:50 |
|
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|