|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
Falcon256
Crewman
Joined: 28 Nov 2006, 01:00 Posts: 16
|
The outposts are not scrap able in the game and in the editor I hope is expanded to include editing systems like the amount of their populations. The building of Outposts is far to slow especially in deep space or planetary systems not colonized or do not have a large industry base
|
11 Apr 2007, 00:56 |
|
|
Zeleni
Aesthetics Surgeon
Joined: 24 Oct 2006, 01:00 Posts: 1350 Location: Croatia
|
Game is in pre alpha stage
_________________ Carpe Diem
|
11 Apr 2007, 01:55 |
|
|
Matress_of_evil
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 01:00 Posts: 7392 Location: Returned to the previous place.
|
Yeah, the game is in pre-alpha stage, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't give things like this thought - if they aren't in yet, they aren't necessarily going to be in until people suggest them!
Keep coming up with ideas Falcon, and welcome to the site!
_________________"Anyone without a sense of humour is truly at the mercy of the rest of us."
|
12 Apr 2007, 17:49 |
|
|
mstrobel
Chief Software Engineer
Joined: 11 Aug 2005, 01:00 Posts: 2688
|
@Falcon: The current editor is not designed to edit data from saved games (like system populations), but rather the game data such as tech objects and civilizations. Values such as the maximum population of a system and its growth rate are computed based on the number of planets in a system, the size and type of each planet, and the preferred planet type of the race inhabiting that planet (or, for an uninhabited system, the preferred planet type of the player's race).
As for stations, you will be able to scrap them, as well as do some other nifty things with them like repair ships (with spacedocks) or perform research (with science stations). At the moment, they just sit there, and I am aware of this.
_________________ Lead Developer of Star Trek: Supremacy 253,658 lines of code and counting...
|
13 Apr 2007, 20:10 |
|
|
Eon_Janus
Cadet
Joined: 18 Sep 2005, 01:00 Posts: 86 Location: Argentina
|
I don't remember what was decided in the previous discussions regarding this matter, so I'll just ask: are stations going to receive experience from battles?
|
16 Apr 2007, 01:15 |
|
|
mstrobel
Chief Software Engineer
Joined: 11 Aug 2005, 01:00 Posts: 2688
|
Eon_Janus wrote: I don't remember what was decided in the previous discussions regarding this matter, so I'll just ask: are stations going to receive experience from battles? Yep, as will any combatant entities
_________________ Lead Developer of Star Trek: Supremacy 253,658 lines of code and counting...
|
16 Apr 2007, 01:47 |
|
|
Jamie11
Ensign
Joined: 28 Sep 2008, 22:02 Posts: 104 Location: Dover, Delaware, USA, Earth, Alpha Quadrant, Milky Way
|
I don't know if this is suppose to be posted here or in another forum, but: Will we be able to build outposts where multiple races control them, such as the Starbase in Starfleet Command 3? It could have advanced technology from both races that would make it more powerful than normal starbases. It could be a staging ground for fleets. When the alliance is terminated, the races would then fight over it during a few turns(as in the personel on the station), then the winner would get it. The race with the most personel would be the one that gets it of course, unless we could do some sort of personel training, then it would depend on numbers and training. As for starting the building, maybe it would become available after 50 turns of an alliance with a race and you would both have to send a construction ship to the same place and it is very volnerable while the starbase is being built, which is why you would need an armada to defend it from your enemies. Didn't know if i should put this with the bases or in a political thread.
|
21 Jan 2009, 05:09 |
|
|
Matress_of_evil
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 01:00 Posts: 7392 Location: Returned to the previous place.
|
I seriously doubt multi-race bases will be in the game, but you never know what aces the creator has up his sleeve. He's surprised me a few times before now with which ideas he implemented. But like i said, I seriously doubt this will be in - or at least not until the AI has been implemented anyways. We'll just have to wait til Mike posts here.
_________________"Anyone without a sense of humour is truly at the mercy of the rest of us."
|
21 Jan 2009, 11:01 |
|
|
mstrobel
Chief Software Engineer
Joined: 11 Aug 2005, 01:00 Posts: 2688
|
No, there are no situations in Supremacy where population numbers will be broken down by individual races. This includes colonies, ships, and stations. For instance, if you (i.e. the Federation) take control of a star system populated by a minor race (i.e. the Bajorans), future population growth in that system will only reflect the predominant (original) race in that sytem. Breaking down populations by multiple races adds a lot of complexity to the game mechanics while adding very little in terms of gameplay value. I've considered these possibilities before, but I've always decided that the required resources (man-hours of programming) would be better spent on other features.
_________________ Lead Developer of Star Trek: Supremacy 253,658 lines of code and counting...
|
21 Jan 2009, 17:30 |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|