[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 379: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4752: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4754: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4755: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4756: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
Star Trek Fan Games - View topic - Colony Ships
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently 03 May 2026, 15:04



Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 Colony Ships 
Author Message
Ensign
Ensign
User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2010, 16:28
Posts: 138
to be honest, I dont really 'get' how a colony ship could populate a system with 20 or so billion people.

So "Colony Fleet"...? And they take the 'passengers' directly from a systems' population.

This is done in a lot of other games, Galciv as I recall just being one of them.


15 Jul 2010, 18:57
Profile
Ship Engineer
Ship Engineer
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2006, 01:00
Posts: 5130
Location: Space is disease and danger, wrapped in darkness and silence!
That is a good way of thinking of it. Our colonyship is just representational. When I think in a concrete way I like to think the colonyship is bringing the factories and farm equipment and golden arches to support the people. The people get there in so many smaller ships that we do not bother to represent.
:borg:


15 Jul 2010, 23:34
Profile
Crazed Emissary of the Photoshop
Crazed Emissary of the Photoshop
User avatar

Joined: 13 Mar 2009, 20:17
Posts: 2091
Location: Krapina, Croatia
Plus we want this game to be a sequel of BOTF and not space empires, galactic civilization.........

I do believe that we need to stay true to BOTF wherever we can.


16 Jul 2010, 09:35
Profile YIM WWW
Ensign
Ensign
User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2010, 16:28
Posts: 138
yes, but even staying true to 'star trek' would mean 'building 1x colony fleet'.

One of the many star trek novel series' was "New Earth" (I think)

anyway, the story was 6 novels, and starts off with a fleet of transport vessels moving the people and the stuff to a new system to colonise, and the escort fleet was simply the Enterprise[refit, dunno if it was pre-wrathofkhan, or -A, post the-movie-that-shall-not-be-named] and two or so 'pickets' or something.

The ship on the cover of the... 5th or 6th, was a weird variation of the TMP Enterprise-refit style design.

Constitution refit saucer and engineering hull and nacelles, but a weird torpedo "Rack" with V-shaped double-neck between the engineering and saucer hulls.
Also, the nacelles were located on roughly on the same horizontal plane as the engineering hull, and double-struts there too.

Various fan websites had different names for the class. A long time ago I called it the Twilight class, anyway.


16 Jul 2010, 19:10
Profile
Crazed Emissary of the Photoshop
Crazed Emissary of the Photoshop
User avatar

Joined: 13 Mar 2009, 20:17
Posts: 2091
Location: Krapina, Croatia
I still think it's unnecessary, we want to be a BOTF sequel. Plus only movies and series are canon and in the Enterprise episode Terra Nova there was only one Conestoga class colony ship colonizing the planet.


16 Jul 2010, 19:26
Profile YIM WWW
Ensign
Ensign
User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2010, 16:28
Posts: 138
For an intended population of...?
Edit:

Allow me to hang a lantern on that particular example.

The Conestoga was the first, and carried 200 people.

Two. Hundred.

Not two hundred thousand....

or two million.

but two. Zero. Zero.

Subsequent colony ships were not dispatched due to many reasons. Distance/speeds, loss of contact, and that the colonists were opposed to the other ships' being sent there anyway.

Therefore Terra Nova can't exactly be held as a shining example of 1 ship to populate a system with millions.


16 Jul 2010, 23:51
Profile
Ship Engineer
Ship Engineer
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2006, 01:00
Posts: 5130
Location: Space is disease and danger, wrapped in darkness and silence!
Without looking it up again I do recall that BOTF had one still image of many ships heading for a planet when a new world was colonized. It would not be a problem to put a number of copies of the colony ship into the combat engine. It would through the dynamics of combat off with more targets. We have not yet accounted for how to deal with the loss of some but not all of the colony ships. This all could be done with no changes in the galactic map view but we would get a lot of comments. Mike might be able to make changes without a lot of fussing but I am skeptical of that. Now, unfortunately, is not the time to ask Mike to make any changes like this as we are on the cusp of releasing our first multiplayer version of the game. There are bigger issues to deal with right now.

For now I would say we have to accept that the colony ship is just representational. I do not mean to just dismissing the idea. It has merit but it may have to wait for BOTF III.
:borg:


17 Jul 2010, 00:53
Profile
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
User avatar

Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 01:00
Posts: 7392
Location: Returned to the previous place.
Yes, BOTF had a colonisation image with ships from multiple races all approaching a planet. BOTF actually had the opposite image as well, with the ships leaving the planet. The image is only included in the program files though and was never used; it was probably for a feature that was never implemented as the rushed the game to market. :(


Like I say, i've got backups of everything on my computer. It was easy enough for me to grab these as soon as you mentioned it, Kenneth. :razz:

I agree that we shouldn't change the system. The game is meant to be representational. We can't expect the game to display hundreds of colony ships at a time. Same goes with the structures, as .Iceman has frequently argued with me. One structure represents the construction of multiple structures or an entire network of them. The game is representational. It doesn't have to be perfect. People didn't have (much of) a problem with that in BOTF, so let's stop getting caught up on this one small issue and start focussing on others.


17 Jul 2010, 13:17
Profile WWW
Ensign
Ensign
User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2010, 16:28
Posts: 138
so its a "this is just the first, once colonisation begins the rest follows" type of deal. okay.


17 Jul 2010, 15:06
Profile
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
User avatar

Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 01:00
Posts: 7392
Location: Returned to the previous place.
Yeah, think of it that way. Your systems grow turn-by-turn afterall. You don't think all of the colonists are baby-making machines, do you?

...They're colonists, not drones. :razz:

Think of the system growth rate as meaning how effective the system is at advertising itself to new colonists, who travel to the system by their own, unseen, devices.


17 Jul 2010, 16:07
Profile WWW
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2004, 01:00
Posts: 690
Location: UK
Yeah I always assumed your fleet of controllable ships was supported by hundreds of civilian/ semi military ships for things like colonisation, supply lines, crew transfer, etc.

Love that alternative BoTF pic Matress.

Will there be race specific scenes for Supremacy? Things like that colonisation pic but with all Federation type ships etc?

_________________
Who says there's never a Klingon around when you need one.


18 Jul 2010, 21:16
Profile
Ship Engineer
Ship Engineer
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2006, 01:00
Posts: 5130
Location: Space is disease and danger, wrapped in darkness and silence!
Once we have a chance to see the updated game in action we can dreaming up some new still images or even short animations. I could see using blenders animation and putting in some of our models. They could be dropping out of warp and into obit around a strange new world. It would be cool to have them pop up in the UI in a new view window. That is if Mike has a way to do anything without rewriting the code from day one.
:borg:


18 Jul 2010, 21:29
Profile
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2004, 01:00
Posts: 690
Location: UK
Would be awesome to have either a brief animation or even a still of a ship of each class departing from space dock, which starts automatically when you build the first ship of a new class.

_________________
Who says there's never a Klingon around when you need one.


18 Jul 2010, 21:36
Profile
Ship Engineer
Ship Engineer
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2006, 01:00
Posts: 5130
Location: Space is disease and danger, wrapped in darkness and silence!
Makes a note :shocked:
Great idea :clap:
I think we should update are shipyards first but I would like to
do that when you build a new ship.
:borg:


18 Jul 2010, 22:02
Profile
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2004, 01:00
Posts: 690
Location: UK
Always wanted that feature, glad you like it. :grin:

Could even go so far as to have it accompanied by a few seconds of relevant music... For example Constitution Class slowly pulls out of the shipyard to the classic starfleet tune, wheras the first Intrepid would have a few seconds of the Voyager theme tune. You already have the religious holiday event accompanied by a choir!! :lol:

_________________
Who says there's never a Klingon around when you need one.


18 Jul 2010, 22:29
Profile
Ship Engineer
Ship Engineer
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2006, 01:00
Posts: 5130
Location: Space is disease and danger, wrapped in darkness and silence!
Given all the possible ships and multiply it by the number of ship yards and fleet yards I do not think we would get all of them as prerecorded animation.

Once we have a combat engine though it is a whole new game. Then you could just write code to have it put in the models as needed. The combat engine plays a little clip of code to run a ship model out of a yard model.

:borg:


18 Jul 2010, 23:55
Profile
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2004, 01:00
Posts: 690
Location: UK
Yeah nice idea. I guess worst case scenario just take the main pic for that ship and photoshop a docking station in the background. Gets the general point across without being a massive job.

_________________
Who says there's never a Klingon around when you need one.


19 Jul 2010, 06:53
Profile
Crazed Emissary of the Photoshop
Crazed Emissary of the Photoshop
User avatar

Joined: 13 Mar 2009, 20:17
Posts: 2091
Location: Krapina, Croatia
http://www.trekmania.net/art/3d_animations.htm

There are some interesting animations here.


19 Jul 2010, 10:59
Profile YIM WWW
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
Evil Romulan Overlord of Evil - Now 100% Faster!
User avatar

Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 01:00
Posts: 7392
Location: Returned to the previous place.
Looks like Dafedz got to the idea before you, SOM. :razz:

Yes, this would be mind-blowing eye candy for the game to have a ship launch animation, but there are potential problems with it, other than the problems Kenneth mentioned; what happens if multiple ship designs become available during the same turn? Do all the video play one after the other? It would be clunky and would quickly get tiresome.

Same goes for a colonisation animation where you colonise multiple systems in the same turn.

And what happens in multiplayer games? Do all players have to wait for each others' animations? This would get boring, and seeing an enemy colonisation movie would give players an unfair advantage. The only way around this is to turn the animations off by default.

But it would seriously be awesome eye candy. :drool:


19 Jul 2010, 17:57
Profile WWW
Ship Engineer
Ship Engineer
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2006, 01:00
Posts: 5130
Location: Space is disease and danger, wrapped in darkness and silence!
I was thinking it would play only on the PC of the user that owned the ships. Also it would work only as fill when that user was otherwise waiting for a turn to cycle. We would interrupt it to continue the game.
:borg:


19 Jul 2010, 18:59
Profile
Admiral
Admiral
User avatar

Joined: 14 Jan 2009, 10:17
Posts: 2042
A colony ship is *a* colony ship. When you build a Cruiser, you're not building a fleet of Cruisers.
Also, if the colony ship is not taking the colonists itself, then it shouldn't be taking the facilities either - where's the room for all that? Where's the cost for all that? It costs as much as any warship.
As for the growth rate being due to some sort of advertisement, hmm, that's an odd concept. The colonists have to come from somewhere. All the other systems have their own growth rates, so...
Colonists are created out of thin air. So they reproduce like rabbits too. :wink:


22 Jul 2010, 13:33
Profile
Crazed Emissary of the Photoshop
Crazed Emissary of the Photoshop
User avatar

Joined: 13 Mar 2009, 20:17
Posts: 2091
Location: Krapina, Croatia
I said it before and I'll say it again, this is a game and not real life, the game has it's own set of rules sometimes different from real life in favor of gameplay. Next thing someone is going to suggest is that we should remove warp drive from the game because nothing can travel faster than EM waves (light included).


22 Jul 2010, 14:08
Profile YIM WWW
Admiral
Admiral
User avatar

Joined: 14 Jan 2009, 10:17
Posts: 2042


22 Jul 2010, 15:21
Profile
Crazed Emissary of the Photoshop
Crazed Emissary of the Photoshop
User avatar

Joined: 13 Mar 2009, 20:17
Posts: 2091
Location: Krapina, Croatia


22 Jul 2010, 15:39
Profile YIM WWW
Admiral
Admiral
User avatar

Joined: 14 Jan 2009, 10:17
Posts: 2042
Of course you are... heheh.

As for this being BotF2, I think it is called Supremacy or something... can't recall right now. :mrgreen:
And yes, ship models and art in general keep changing... Damn, I hate that. Let's stop with the art changes already!!!! It's making me crazy!!

:borg:


22 Jul 2010, 15:44
Profile
Crazed Emissary of the Photoshop
Crazed Emissary of the Photoshop
User avatar

Joined: 13 Mar 2009, 20:17
Posts: 2091
Location: Krapina, Croatia
Art is the most flexible part of the game, and the easiest to change or improve, plus if we have higher quality image that could replace lower quality one, the logical thing is to use it.


22 Jul 2010, 16:10
Profile YIM WWW
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2004, 01:00
Posts: 690
Location: UK

_________________
Who says there's never a Klingon around when you need one.


22 Jul 2010, 21:33
Profile
Ship Engineer
Ship Engineer
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2006, 01:00
Posts: 5130
Location: Space is disease and danger, wrapped in darkness and silence!
I found the last episode of Battlestar Galactica to be odd. All the colonists just walked out into the countryside with the clothing they had on and not much else. Did they plan on eating grass and live in the trees? Even if you are going to be a subsistence farmer you need tools, seeds and even a tent would be nice.

I like to think of the colony ship as delivering the basic infrastructure that would allow people to live off the natural resources of the new planet. It would be future tech items but Star Fleet would be the only organization with the means to deliver it in substantial amount. The colony ship plants the flag, sets up the shop and opens the door for business. I do not worry about counting the people or the ships they use.

It is just a game so please think of it as you chose.
:borg:


22 Jul 2010, 23:04
Profile
Admiral
Admiral
User avatar

Joined: 14 Jan 2009, 10:17
Posts: 2042


26 Jul 2010, 17:12
Profile
Crewman
User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2010, 06:01
Posts: 11
I like the current colonisation process, which is much simpler and saves time. Unlike the original BOTF, where you had to terraform every single planet in a new system, it is nice that the new function automatically terraforms every planet in a system.

That being said, what about an option allowing a colony ship the option of joining a system and adding to its population? Pardon me if this sounds too much like the Civilisation-series, but I think it would be nice to quickly augment a system's population, especially if it is one that borders a rival power.

On a side note to those complaining about the "lack of realism" about only one colony ship having everything, I think it is fair to claim the colony ships have replicators that can fabricate tools. This would be consistent with TNG canon at least.


30 Jul 2010, 00:26
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by STSoftware.